[DCRM-L] DPC: Omission of names in statements of responsibility(DCRM 1E5)

[Laurence Creider]

Erin,

Did you perhaps leave something out?  Maybe an "or" or "and?"  The second 
sentence of the rule in 1E5 does not make sense and seems to be 
contradicted by the example:

Indicate the omission by the mark of omission and supply "et al." after it 
in square brackets a phrase in the language and script of the cataloging 
agency to convey the extent of the omission.
>
> / idee e motti di Giannino Antona-Traversi ; disegni di G. Ardy, A.
> Bonzagni, A. Cagnoni ... [and 7 others] ; sculture di V. Franco

Larry Creider

On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Erin Blake wrote:

> Based on Manon's suggestions, here's a revised version of the proposed
> change, to be voted on by BSC members on Monday.
>
> The only changes from Monday's version are the addition of the missing
> words "after it" and the addition of 1E5 to the list of examples of
> exceptional rules in 0F1.2. If there's any more discussion, let it
> happen....
>
>
>
> Here are the relevant sections in html, with old text crossed out and
> new text underlined (plain text version follows). The example comes from
> the DCRM(G) draft.
>
> 1E5. . . .  Optionally, if the responsible persons or bodies named in a
> single statement are considered too numerous to list exhaustively, all
> after the third may be omitted. Indicate the omission by the mark of
> omission and supply "et al." after it in square brackets a phrase in the
> language and script of the cataloging agency to convey the extent of the
> omission.
>
> / idee e motti di Giannino Antona-Traversi ; disegni di G. Ardy, A.
> Bonzagni, A. Cagnoni ... [and 7 others] ; sculture di V. Franco
>
>
> 0F1.2. Give interpolations into these areas in the language and script
> of the other information in the area, except for prescribed
> interpolations and other cases specified in these rules (e.g., 1E5, 4B5,
> 4B6.2, 4C6.2). . . .
>
>
>
> Below is the original text followed by the proposed change for anyone
> with plain-text e-mail who can't see the crossings-out and underlinings:
>
>
> ORIGINAL:
>
> 1E5. . . . Optionally, if the responsible persons or bodies named in a
> single statement are considered too numerous to list exhaustively, all
> after the third may be omitted. Indicate the omission by the mark of
> omission and supply "et al." in square brackets.
>
>
>
> 0F1.2. Give interpolations into these areas in the language and script
> of the other information in the area, except for prescribed
> interpolations and other cases specified in these rules (e.g., 4B5,
> 4B6.2, 4C6.2). . . .
>
> PROPOSED CHANGE:
>
> 1E5. . . . Optionally, if the responsible persons or bodies named in a
> single statement are considered too numerous to list exhaustively, all
> after the third may be omitted. Indicate the omission by the mark of
> omission and supply after it in square brackets a phrase in the language
> and script of the cataloging agency to convey the extent of the
> omission.
>
>
>
> 0F1.2. [add 1E5 to parenthetical examples of exceptions]
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>   EB.
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Erin C. Blake, Ph.D.  |  Curator of Art & Special Collections  |  Folger
> Shakespeare Library  |  201 E. Capitol St. SE  | Washington, DC
> 20003-1004  |  office tel. (202) 675-0323  |  fax:  (202) 675-0328  |
> eblake at folger.edu  |  www.folger.edu
>
>
>
>

Laurence S. Creider
Special Collections Librarian
New Mexico State University
Las Cruces, NM  88003
Work: 575-646-7227
Fax: 575-646-7477
lcreider at lib.nmsu.edu