[DCRM-L] Single Sheet with Two or More Works.

[Will Evans]

“[1] p.”? For convenience of cataloging, the rule allows us to ignore the
fact that the two items were issued together on one sheet. Therefore might
we ignore the sheet and recognize one page only?



*From:* dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] *On
Behalf Of *Deborah J. Leslie
*Sent:* Thursday, October 27, 2011 3:51 PM
*To:* DCRM Revision Group List
*Subject:* Re: [DCRM-L] Single Sheet with Two or More Works.



One page, I think. But the question is whether to use "1 sheet ([1] p.)" or
just "[1] p."



*From:* dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] *On
Behalf Of *Will Evans
*Sent:* Thursday, 27 October 2011 14:34
*To:* dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu
*Subject:* [DCRM-L] Single Sheet with Two or More Works.



Item in hand is a single sheet publication with two works (one on each side)
lacking a collective title, and it is impossible to determine which side
should be read first. According to 1G7 one is instructed to make a separate
bibliographic record for each side of the sheet and include a formal “With
on verso” note in each record. Fine.



But what is one to enter in the extent element in the physical description
field of each record? One page or two?



Thanks in advance.



Will







*WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW*

Will Evans

Chief Rare Materials Catalog Librarian

Library of the Boston Athenaeum

10 1/2 Beacon Street

Boston, MA   02108



Tel:  617-227-0270 ext. 224

Fax: 617-227-5266

www.bostonathenaeum.org

* *

*WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20111027/89d0c60c/attachment.htm