[DCRM-L] Relationship designators

[Allison Jai O'Dell]

This is exactly what I have done.

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Valerie Buck <valerie_buck at byu.edu> wrote:

> I've been using both RDA and RBMS relationship designators. But if the
> RBMS designator is abbreviated, I have opted to spell it out.
>


Re: subsequent relator terms:  is there an online catalog model that
would have numerous |e in MARC format make sense for indexing?  I can only
think of two approaches -- either treat the entire 7xx field as a single
phrase for indexing, or treat it as a set of hierarchical terms (as in
http://beta.freelibrary.org).  In neither case would duplicate |e
really facilitate collocation.



Allison



*Allison Jai O'Dell*

Charles Dickens Cataloging Consultant

Rare Book Department

The Free Library of Philadelphia

Follow @FLP_Dickens <http://twitter.com/FLP_Dickens> on Twitter!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20120724/c4d2ff67/attachment.htm>