[DCRM-L] Publication (etc.) statements -- BL proposal

[Deborah J. Leslie]

Ditto. I especially like Scenario 1 for its simplicity and ability to get the job done.

Deborah J. Leslie | Folger Shakespeare Library | djleslie at folger.edu | 202.675-0369 | 201 East Capitol St., SE, Washington, DC 20003 | www. folger.edu

From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On Behalf Of Erin Blake
Sent: Saturday, 17 May 2014 20:10
To: DCRM Users' Group
Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] Publication (etc.) statements -- BL proposal

Hooray! Brilliant! Love it! Transcribing the Publication (etc.) statement and leaving the parsing of elements to a controlled vocabulary makes perfect sense. Presumably you wouldn’t supply a statement if the information was already transcribed as part another area, same as you don’t supply a statement of responsibility.

Erin.

----------------
Erin C. Blake, Ph.D.  |  Head of Collection Information Services  |  Folger Shakespeare Library  |  201 E. Capitol St. SE, Washington, DC, 20003  |  eblake at folger.edu<mailto:eblake at folger.edu>  |  office tel. +1 202-675-0323<tel:%2B1%20202-675-0323>  |  fax +1 202-675-0328<tel:%2B1%20202-675-0328>  |  www.folger.edu<http://www.folger.edu/>





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20140521/d4e3b152/attachment.html>