[DCRM-L] Odd signing

[Robert Steele]

Sorry I haven't replied sooner; I've been out sick with a cold.

The book is:

Disputatio historico-politica inauguralis :|bex jure publico promta,
de Gulielmo III, principe Arausiaco, libertatis Europae contra
dominationem Gallicam vindice /|cquam ... pro gradu doctoratus
summisque in jure Romano et hodierno ... in Academia Lugduno-Batava
... submittit, Gulielmus van Hogendorp.
Lugduni Batavorum :|bapud H.W. Hazenberg juniorem,|cMDCCCXIX [1819]

OCLC: 27994312

John: Chainlines and untrimmed edges show that the book is octavo.

Richard: I doubt that a dissertation (a real one, pre-degree, not a
later commercial issue) would be put in standing type or for that
matter printed from plates in 1819, since the print run would probably
not support the expense, although my familiarity with Leyden printing
practice is much less extensive than my familiarity with France and
Italy. But my question is about how to construct the signature
statement.

Deborah: Yes, I think the book is "signed" is some system or other,
and so I would like to represent the "signings" somehow.

If the only purpose of the statement is to describe the book
structure, them [1]-[15]⁸ certainly does it. But most signature
statements represent the signings actually present, if for no other
reason than ease of reference, at least when these signings do not
contradict the actual book structure (as in the case of unused
signings and/or re-use of plates).

I can see "[1]-[15]⁸" as the signature statement, but then ideally I
would like a note like: Gatherings signed: A, A2, A3, -, B, B2, B3, -
; C, C2, C3, -, D, D2, D3, - ; etc.

Option:

A⁸ C⁸ ... 2F⁸; with note: A5,6,7 signed B1,2,3; C5,6,7 signed D1,2,3, etc.

But maybe this is too complex.

I would also like to see other publications by this printer to see if
this was his common practice (which, by the way, is why I would like
to see signature statements for all 19th century books, but that's a
different conversation).

Robert Steele
Jacob Burns Law Library
George Washington University





On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Noble, Richard
<richard_noble at brown.edu> wrote:
> The only situation in which this might make sense would be composition of
> the entire text for 4s or with the option to print in 4s, and a change of
> mind or final decision to print in 8s, which implies the use of plates, or
> non-letterpress printing of some sort--or 240 pages of standing type!
>
> I'm with John in wanting to know what book this is. I would be very grateful
> if everyone with similar questions would henceforth provide a proper
> citation. Something as laconic as "Leiden, 1819" is as much as many
> inquirers provide, and all too often it just adds another round of
> correspondence.
>
> RICHARD NOBLE :: RARE MATERIALS CATALOGUER :: JOHN HAY LIBRARY
> BROWN UNIVERSITY  ::  PROVIDENCE, R.I. 02912  ::  401-863-1187
> <Richard_Noble at Brown.edu>
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:28 AM, JOHN LANCASTER <jjlancaster at me.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not the expert, but I'd find it useful to know more about the book:
>> Author, title, imprint? And is there evidence for octavo beyond the fact
>> that it's gathered in eights?  (Chain lines; watermarks?)
>>
>> John Lancaster
>>
>>
>> On 2014 Nov 18, at 11:12, Deborah J. Leslie <DJLeslie at FOLGER.edu> wrote:
>>
>> > It doesn't look like anyone has responded to this yet, Bob. I don't
>> > think you can call it unsigned, so it's up to your 2nd or 3rd options. What
>> > does the expert say? (I'm looking at you, Richard Noble.)
>> >
>> > Deborah J. Leslie | Folger Shakespeare Library | djleslie at folger.edu |
>> > 202.675-0369 | 201 East Capitol St., SE, Washington, DC 20003 | www.
>> > folger.edu
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On
>> > Behalf Of Robert Steele
>> > Sent: Friday, 07 November 2014 10:37
>> > To: dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu
>> > Subject: [DCRM-L] Odd signing
>> >
>> > Collective wisdom:
>> >
>> > I think something like this was discussed a few weeks ago, but this time
>> > I can see the threads.
>> >
>> > Dissertation from Leiden, 1819. Octavo (as I said, I can see the
>> > threads). The signings are in this pattern:
>> >
>> > A, A2, A3, -, B, B2, B3, - // C, C2, C3, -, D, D2, D3, - // etc.
>> > throughout.
>> >
>> > I don't think this is a situation of "double signing," since plates are
>> > unlikely to have been used for a dissertation in 1819. Also, since the pages
>> > are untrimmed, I don't think the sheet could have been cut in half and
>> > folded another way. I have no idea why the printer used these signings, but
>> > anyway I want to construct a signature statement.
>> > Would you suggest:
>> >
>> > Unsigned, [1]-[15]⁸?
>> >
>> > or:
>> >
>> > A⁸ C⁸ ... 2F⁸?
>> >
>> > or:
>> >
>> > A/B⁸ C/D⁸ ... 2F/2G⁸?
>> >
>> > or something else?
>> >
>> > Robert Steele
>> > Jacob Burns Law Library
>> > George Washington University
>>
>