[DCRM-L] OCLC's IR webinar (May 13)

[Moody, Honor M.]

Hello all,

Here is one more Harvard response. 

I can't speak to what decision Harvard will ultimately make concerning implementation of LBDs, but I did wish to respond to Allison's 2nd point. Someone asked why a library would want/need LBDs if they were the only ones to see the LBDs, and I understood the response to be that we probably don't need them if we have our own catalogs, and that the best use case scenario for LBD is the WMS only member. I think the idea the LBDs are somehow a replacement for IRs is a red herring, and it's unfortunate that OCLC seems to be conflating them (either that or it demonstrates a fundamentally different understanding of the purpose of the IR).

Furthermore, the Harvard Library has 30 OCLC symbols in use; I asked in the 11am webinar if individual libraries would be able to view the others' LBD. The response was that we would only be able to view the symbol associated with the login.  Speaking personally, I can't imagine that the LBD would ever be more useful than Harvard's shared local catalog (or even the notes on our old catalog cards, for that matter).  

I also found the statement that no end of life date has been determined for Connexion quite ominous.  More generally speaking, I found the responses were often very vague and didn't necessarily answer the question being asked in a meaningful way.

Best,
Honor

Honor Moody
Cataloger
Schlesinger Library
Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study
3 James Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
Tel.: (617) 495-4223
Email: hmoody at radcliffe.harvard.edu 

From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On Behalf Of Nipps, Karen
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 5:00 PM
To: Allison_Rich at brown.edu; DCRM Users' Group
Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] OCLC's IR webinar (May 13)

Oh, Harvard is as pissed as anyone about this! ☺ We are also contemplating not going the LBD route. However, as ILL can’t happen without OCLC, we are going to have to find a way to stay with them and at the same time ensure that the quality of our local work is not lost. I believe Bob Maxwell once addressed this – it will be a common problem for large research libraries. This is a tall order. I AM feeling and acting snarky – and am proud of it. 

Karen Nipps
Head, Rare Book Team
Houghton Library
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02138
Phone: 617-496-9190
FAX: 617-495-1376

From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On Behalf Of Allison Rich
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 3:42 PM
To: DCRM Users' Group
Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] OCLC's IR webinar (May 13)

Hello Will and Richard and all:

I could get snarky here too. But I will try and refrain from such low behavior.
Nevertheless I have a few points to add:

1) We are a small community of people who care about item level descriptions, as creators. I know that our patrons here at the John Carter Brown Library are truly grateful for the full level descriptions. But, let's face it, most people who don't use special collections libraries simply don't care about such detail. So, in that way, Richard's comment of "However that therm is technically defined, we know that in our endeavor, this means that Excellent + Good = Good, Good + Good Enough = Good Enough, Good Enough + OK = OK, OK + Whatever = Whatever, and that the job is to persuade the customers that Whatever is the New Excellence" is particularly and very painfully true.

2) We will most likely **not** be using LDB or the new program - whose name escapes me at the moment, sorry - simply because the information will only be available for viewing by the Brown University system and by no one else. The local, full record in the ILS will be better than anything LBD can offer. Perhaps at large institutions such as Harvard who has numerous libraries this will be a useful program as the larger Harvard community will be able to see the local data issued by the various holding libraries. But that is just speculation on my part.

3) The ominous statement that OCLC issued about not having a firm date for the death of the Connexion client was most worrisome to us after the webinar. My gut feeling tells me that Connexion will be killed off after BIBFRAME becomes the new MARC. What worries me is that a program like Record Manager will be the new form of display for ILS platforms. If that is the case then we might be in for a very cruel shock. But this is just me, unless any of the rest of you had the same feeling.

4) A plethora of #5 500 fields will overcrowd the MARC record and make it look terribly clunky!!! I rarely upgrade the master record because we have always utilized IRs and besides in a world filled with variants with poor master records without citations how can one **really** upgrade a master record made by someone else if they are unsure whether that master record is that they truly have in hand??? 

5) I was the one that asked the questions about getting rid of lesser quality records from the database in the very last minutes of the presentation. And I meant it. If we are being encouraged to streamline ourselves, I submit
a quote to them from the gospel of Luke: "Physician, heal thyself". And clean up your own house before asking other people to streamline their own.

I have worked at institutions where I have only been encouraged to "get the books on the shelves". I have always done more. I refuse to do mediocre work. Thankfully at my library my work IS appreciated by staff and patrons. But in the wider world, sadly, I am "Allosaurus", a big, plant-eating dinosaur. I have more years worth of work ahead of me in this field (I hope) and I will roll with and learn whatever follows MARC. I know that change is inevitable. But, like Richard, I fear that "Whatever" is the new "Excellent". 

Best for now,
Allison 

-- 

********************************
"Outside of a dog, 
a book is probably man's best friend,
and inside of a dog, 
it's too dark to read. 
- Groucho Marx"

Allison Rich
Rare Materials Cataloguer
ESTC and NACO Coordinator

John Carter Brown Library
Providence, Rhode Island
Allison_Rich at brown.edu

********************************