[DCRM-L] OCLC's IR webinar (May 13)
Jennifer MacDonald
jsmacdon at udel.edu
Fri May 15 09:02:52 MDT 2015
Yes, I do everything else as I did before -- select the record, update
or enhance as needed, submit countless merge requests. WMS is accessed
via a web browser, and is rather clunky, so I still do most of this in
Connexion. WMS only has an online save file, not a local save file, so I
prefer being able to save in my local file as well, rather than clutter
up a shared space. Additionally, I have to do my NACO work in
Connexion, because there isn't a way to do that yet in WMS (of which I
am aware). The main difference in workflow is that instead of exporting
records, I attach holdings and bib data directly to a master record.
On 5/15/2015 10:42 AM, Noble, Richard wrote:
> This may be turning into too much of a thread variant, but...
>
> What control do you have over the selection of a master record (given
> the /many/ possibilities in the WorldCat database) and are you able to
> edit/upgrade it at the manifestation level? That is, do institutional
> catalogers retain "enhance" status?
>
> RICHARD NOBLE :: RARE MATERIALS CATALOGUER :: JOHN HAY LIBRARY
> BROWN UNIVERSITY :: PROVIDENCE, R.I. 02912 :: 401-863-1187
> <Richard_Noble at Br <mailto:RICHARD_NOBLE at BROWN.EDU>own.edu
> <http://own.edu>>
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Jennifer MacDonald
> <jsmacdon at udel.edu <mailto:jsmacdon at udel.edu>> wrote:
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> I have been silent on all of this, but I guess it's time to chime
> in. University of Delaware became the first "major" institution to
> adopt WorldShare Management Services, and we migrated last summer.
>
> WMS (which goes by many derogatory nicknames here, like WMD) is
> the way OCLC takes over your ILS. Circulation, reserves,
> cataloging, acquisitions, everything. Not to put too fine a point
> on it, hearing talk about going to check an institution's local
> catalog makes me cringe, because WE NO LONGER HAVE A LOCAL
> CATALOG. We have OCLC records with extra things dangling from
> them. Whenever I explain it to someone outside of our library,
> they ask if I'm looking for another job (I'm not). The library
> spent about 18 months working with OCLC on the system, then
> another 12 months when it became clear that they wouldn't be ready
> for the go live date, and there is still continual communication
> and activity between UD and OCLC.
>
> When I search for a record in the metadata module of WMS, it takes
> me to the master record, the Local Bib Data (if there is one), and
> the Local Holdings Record (if there is one). Local notes go into
> the LBD (natch, but you never know with these things). Because
> I've been in denial for the past year, I haven't checked what our
> records look like on the other end, but I figured now was the
> time, and I have had a friend at a different institution take a
> look. _It is, in fact, possible for others to see the LBD_. When
> the holdings come up in WorldCat.org (I don't know about
> FirstSearch, I didn't check that yet), if you click on the holding
> library's name, the notes come up under the "Details" section.
> This isn't a very exciting record (the book happened to be on my
> desk because one of the copies dropped out in the migration, which
> is a story for another day), but if you want to take a look, this
> is the record she checked:
> http://www.worldcat.org/title/entailed-hat-or-patty-cannons-times-a-romance/oclc/1875667&referer=brief_results
>
> Believe me, I'm not a fan of WMS, but at least for now, I know
> people can see our local data. Or at least she could ...
>
> Jennifer MacDonald
>
--
Jennifer MacDonald
Associate Librarian and Coordinator,
Special Collections Cataloging and Processing
Metadata Services Department
University of Delaware Library
Newark, DE 19717-5267
302-831-1512
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20150515/a0093bae/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the DCRM-L
mailing list