[DCRM-L] binder and binding designer

[David Richtmyer]

If both terms can be correctly used for a single individual; I'd use both
(and have done so myself with other relator terms). I don't see any reason
to limit yourself to just one term, unless your ILS cannot handle having
more than one relator code in its public interface. If that is the case, I
think I'd use "binder" alone.

David

*****************************
David Richtmyer
Rare Books Cataloger & Jesuitica Librarian
Burns Library, Boston College
140 Commonwealth Avenue
Chestnut Hill, MA 02467-3801
617-552-0543

VNA VOX LIBRORVM,
sed non omnes aeqve
    ~ INFORMAT ~


On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Lapka, Francis <francis.lapka at yale.edu>
wrote:

> RBMS relationship designators include terms for “binder” and for “binding
> designer.” Presumably, the first of these does the labor, the second
> conceives of the design.
>
>
>
> When I trace the name of a person who has executed a fine binding (design
> and labor), should I use both terms? If just one, which?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Francis Lapka  ·  Catalog Librarian
>
> Dept. of Rare Books and Manuscripts
>
> Yale Center for British Art
>
> 203.432.9672 <(203)%20432-9672>  ·  francis.lapka at yale.edu
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20161220/42dbf224/attachment-0001.html>