[DCRM-L] binder and binding designer

[Will Evans]

I’ve used both. It hadn’t occurred to me not to do so, if  I have been sure
that the person is responsible for both tasks.







*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*

Will Evans

National Endowment for the Humanities

Chief Librarian in Charge of Technical Services

Library of the Boston Athenaeum

10 1/2 Beacon Street

Boston, MA   02108



Tel:  617-227-0270 ext. 243

Fax: 617-227-5266

www.bostonathenaeum.org







*From:* dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] *On
Behalf Of *Lapka, Francis
*Sent:* Tuesday, December 20, 2016 9:23 AM
*To:* dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu
*Subject:* [DCRM-L] binder and binding designer



RBMS relationship designators include terms for “binder” and for “binding
designer.” Presumably, the first of these does the labor, the second
conceives of the design.



When I trace the name of a person who has executed a fine binding (design
and labor), should I use both terms? If just one, which?







Francis Lapka  ·  Catalog Librarian

Dept. of Rare Books and Manuscripts

Yale Center for British Art

203.432.9672  ·  francis.lapka at yale.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20161220/3846f01c/attachment.html>