[DCRM-L] What Belongs in a Master Record?

[Noble, Richard]

One other thing: What's with the doubling of the 100/240 with a 700 02?

RICHARD NOBLE :: RARE MATERIALS CATALOGUER :: JOHN HAY LIBRARY
BROWN UNIVERSITY  ::  PROVIDENCE, R.I. 02912  ::  401-863-1187
<Richard_Noble at Br <RICHARD_NOBLE at BROWN.EDU>own.edu>

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Noble, Richard <richard_noble at brown.edu>
wrote:

> I am thrashing about in the underbrush of OCLC records for incunabula,
> trying to create the occasional orderly clearing, but in the end I am
> wondering what special unwritten rules there are concerning master records
> that allow for such an *omnium gatherum* of copy-specific elements as
> OCLC #56414568 (LCCN 2004574211 with revisions by Detroit PL and
> Columbia).
>
> The information is interesting, no doubt of that; but there are facilities
> for accessing it in more coherent form by way of the institutional catalogs
> to which OCLC provides relatively easy access. I certainly don't want most
> of it in my own institution's record (though it will be worth noting that
> the Brown and the LC copies both have a Buxheim stamp).
>
> Would I be justified in updating this record in part to delete all
> copy-specific that has no bearing on identification of, or actual variation
> in copies of, the  manifestation? This question often arises in connection
> with LC-based records, of course, but lots of libraries do this sort of
> thing, even adding copy-specific information to the OCLC record rather than
> making local edits. Is this just shared cataloging with a vengeance?
>
> RICHARD NOBLE :: RARE MATERIALS CATALOGUER :: JOHN HAY LIBRARY
> BROWN UNIVERSITY  ::  PROVIDENCE, R.I. 02912  ::  401-863-1187
> <Richard_Noble at Br <RICHARD_NOBLE at BROWN.EDU>own.edu>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20161027/9ad086ff/attachment.html>