[DCRM-L] Source of title in 588?

[Robert Maxwell]

Thanks, Matt--I momentarily forgot that the description based on note gets combined with the source of title note in the CSR so it isn't true that "I would never use it for the source of title." But I can't recall having seen it used for source of title alone (that is, without combining it with the description based on note). But I guess there is precedent for having that sort of information in 588.

Bob

Robert L. Maxwell
Ancient Languages and Special Collections Cataloger
6728 Harold B. Lee Library
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
(801)422-5568

"We should set an example for all the world, rather than confine ourselves to the course which has been heretofore pursued"--Eliza R. Snow, 1842.

________________________________
From: DCRM-L <dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu> on behalf of Matthew C. Haugen <mch2167 at columbia.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 2:35 PM
To: DCRM Users' Group <dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu>
Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] Source of title in 588?

P.S. I also generally have a preference for using a more precise MARC field than 500 when one is available, to support mapping out of MARC. And I do commonly see title source notes in 588 fields, because the CONSER standard record profile instructs "Always make a note giving the source of title, even if it is the title page. Combine the note with a "Description based on" note (see 2.17.13). Encode the two notes in a single 588 field."

The CSR's use of the field to combine separate notes notwithstanding, Erin and Bob have made great points about the definition of the 588 field and the need for more prominent display of title source data than is currently the case for 588 in some (many?) catalogs.

Matt

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:08 PM Robert Maxwell <robert_maxwell at byu.edu<mailto:robert_maxwell at byu.edu>> wrote:
The field is not restricted to serials use, but it isn't for "source of title"--it's for "source of description", i.e. the "description based on" note. This is much broader than where the title came from. It's used, of course, universally in serials records, but I routinely use it in monograph records--for example to say that I'm basing my catalog record on the fourth (or fifteenth, etc.) printing of a manifestation, which may have some slight differences from what I would have found if I had actually had the first printing in hand (e.g. addition of an ISBN or some different wording on the title page verso).

588 0  15th printing.

But I would never use it for the source of the title. As others have noted, that needs to be up front, in a field that displays to the public (at least in our catalog we've set 588 not to display).

Bob

Robert L. Maxwell
Ancient Languages and Special Collections Cataloger
6728 Harold B. Lee Library
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
(801)422-5568

"We should set an example for all the world, rather than confine ourselves to the course which has been heretofore pursued"--Eliza R. Snow, 1842.

________________________________
From: DCRM-L <dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu<mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu>> on behalf of Cawelti, Andrea <cawelti at fas.harvard.edu<mailto:cawelti at fas.harvard.edu>>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 1:08 PM
To: 'dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu<mailto:dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu>' <dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu<mailto:dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu>>
Subject: [DCRM-L] Source of title in 588?


Greetings, fellow catalogers, I recently heard a recommendation to use the 588 field for notes along the lines of “Title supplied by cataloger,” a common note in special collections cataloging. It would be useful to have a specific 500 note for this kind of information, but I was under the impression in the 588 was only for serials use. Do folks think this field is appropriate for graphics, collections, monographs, etc., without indicators? I have asked among music colleagues on the Music OCLC Users’ Group, and received a resounding yes. Is anyone here using the 588 for this kind of note? Had any experiences with the note not displaying in local catalogs, etc.? What have you learned if you are using this note, that you think others should know?

Thoughts/complaints/recriminations?

Thank you for your guidance, andrea

 --

Andrea Cawelti (Ms.)
Ward Music Cataloger
Houghton Library
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA  02138

Phone: (617) 998-5259
FAX: (617) 495-1376
E-mail: cawelti at fas.harvard.edu<mailto:cawelti at fas.harvard.edu>




--
Matthew C. Haugen
Rare Book Cataloger | Columbia University Libraries
matthew.haugen at columbia.edu<mailto:matthew.haugen at columbia.edu> | 212-851-2451 | he/him/his
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20200722/0061975d/attachment.html>