[DCRM-L] Fund information, for the online catalog

[Lapka, Francis]

I appreciate all the helpful replies. So many possibilities!

It's intriguing to consider the fund as a 7xx access point. While MARC relators and RBMS relationship designators have item-appropriate terms for donor and honoree, neither has a term corresponding to an acquisition funder (MARC's funder is a work relationship). Perhaps we should propose one for the RBMS CV?

Francis


From: DCRM-L <dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu> On Behalf Of Deborah J. Leslie
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 9:08 PM
To: 'DCRM Users' Group' <dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu>
Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] Fund information, for the online catalog

Hello everyone. Our current procedures for identifying fund names in catalog records evolved in the wake of the Folger's adopting Tessitura<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tessituranetwork.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancis.lapka%40yale.edu%7C746535c6e3d140d18d5608d9f73a8c62%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637812653870496752%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=V6x7BvPZ7owTZU6xxowyGx9Ysk4Wk5E1BqX35RNWrM4%3D&reserved=0>. They can be found in this Folgerpedia article<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffolgerpedia.folger.edu%2FVirtual_bookplates&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancis.lapka%40yale.edu%7C746535c6e3d140d18d5608d9f73a8c62%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637812653870496752%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=m0Iad9RGt%2FmnW8G47Wj0jpZYkPgnD1rh4XBUeh2C1vw%3D&reserved=0>.
______________________
Deborah J Leslie, M.A., M.L.S. | Senior Cataloger | Folger Shakespeare Library | 201 East Capitol Street, S.E. Washington, DC 20003 | djleslie at folger.edu<mailto:djleslie at folger.edu> | www.folger.edu<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.folger.edu%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancis.lapka%40yale.edu%7C746535c6e3d140d18d5608d9f73a8c62%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637812653870496752%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=NN2zR%2FJHKhS6Tqfz6XQYmvyp1cD9APz2oXxqsMfj9oo%3D&reserved=0> | Opinions her own

From: DCRM-L <dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu<mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu>> On Behalf Of Lapka, Francis
Sent: Wednesday, 23 February, 2022 14:56
To: DCRM Users' Group <dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu<mailto:dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu>>
Subject: [DCRM-L] Fund information, for the online catalog

Colleagues,

When you want fund information to display in the online catalog, what field do you use? My instinct is to find a home for it in field 541 of the Holdings record<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fprotect-us.mimecast.com%2Fs%2Fyv5HC73yPMHRNwKh8BRcD%3Fdomain%3Dloc.gov&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancis.lapka%40yale.edu%7C746535c6e3d140d18d5608d9f73a8c62%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637812653870496752%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=WVvabUi6d%2B%2Fs2ZXHUa2s3O0kfCmt50KHWS2ntdU8E%2Bc%3D&reserved=0>, but the semantics of 541 subfields are all imperfect matches. In my ideal world, the fund data would display in alignment with the pertinent holding and it would be indexed as a search facet.

What do others do?

Thanks,
Francis



Francis Lapka
Senior Catalog Librarian
Department of Rare Books and Manuscripts
Yale Center for British Art
203-432-9672  *  francis.lapka at yale.edu<mailto:francis.lapka at yale.edu>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20220224/a2a06ec3/attachment.htm>