[DCRM-L] Fund information, for the online catalog

[Jennifer Dunlap]

We have traditionally included the fund in a 541 $h in our holdings records
with the 541 coded as private with a public 561 note indicating the fund
and date, ex) Purchased in [date] with the [fund(s)]). This practice was
revised in 2020 with the decision to code the 541 as a public note and
discontinue the use of the 561 indicating the fund or 'Gift of' statement.
Currently our format is: 541 1_ $c [Method of acquisition]; $a [Name of
vendor or donor]; $d [date of acquisition]; $e [accession #]; $h [name of
fund used if acquisition is a purchase]. The display in our catalog renders
the 541 with the label "Source of acquisition" and reorders the subfield
codes to alphabetical order (e.g., Source of acquisition: [Dealer];
Purchase; [Date]; [accession #]; [Fund], Source of acquisition: John Smith;
Gift; [date]; [accession number].



*Jennifer Dunlap*

Rare Book Cataloger

Houghton Library, Harvard University

Cambridge, MA 02138

617.998.5219

jennifer_dunlap at harvard.edu


On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 3:07 PM Lapka, Francis <francis.lapka at yale.edu>
wrote:

> I appreciate all the helpful replies. So many possibilities!
>
>
>
> It’s intriguing to consider the fund as a 7xx access point. While MARC
> relators and RBMS relationship designators have item-appropriate terms for
> *donor* and *honoree*, neither has a term corresponding to an acquisition
> funder (MARC’s *funder* is a work relationship). Perhaps we should
> propose one for the RBMS CV?
>
>
>
> Francis
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* DCRM-L <dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu> *On Behalf Of *Deborah J.
> Leslie
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 23, 2022 9:08 PM
> *To:* 'DCRM Users' Group' <dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu>
> *Subject:* Re: [DCRM-L] Fund information, for the online catalog
>
>
>
> Hello everyone. Our current procedures for identifying fund names in
> catalog records evolved in the wake of the Folger’s adopting Tessitura
> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tessituranetwork.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancis.lapka%40yale.edu%7C746535c6e3d140d18d5608d9f73a8c62%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637812653870496752%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=V6x7BvPZ7owTZU6xxowyGx9Ysk4Wk5E1BqX35RNWrM4%3D&reserved=0>.
> They can be found in this Folgerpedia article
> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffolgerpedia.folger.edu%2FVirtual_bookplates&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancis.lapka%40yale.edu%7C746535c6e3d140d18d5608d9f73a8c62%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637812653870496752%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=m0Iad9RGt%2FmnW8G47Wj0jpZYkPgnD1rh4XBUeh2C1vw%3D&reserved=0>.
>
>
> ______________________
>
> Deborah J Leslie, M.A., M.L.S. | Senior Cataloger | Folger Shakespeare
> Library | 201 East Capitol Street, S.E. Washington, DC 20003 |
> djleslie at folger.edu | www.folger.edu
> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.folger.edu%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancis.lapka%40yale.edu%7C746535c6e3d140d18d5608d9f73a8c62%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637812653870496752%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=NN2zR%2FJHKhS6Tqfz6XQYmvyp1cD9APz2oXxqsMfj9oo%3D&reserved=0>
> | Opinions her own
>
>
>
> *From:* DCRM-L <dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu> *On Behalf Of *Lapka, Francis
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 23 February, 2022 14:56
> *To:* DCRM Users' Group <dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu>
> *Subject:* [DCRM-L] Fund information, for the online catalog
>
>
>
> Colleagues,
>
>
>
> When you want fund information to display in the online catalog, what
> field do you use? My instinct is to find a home for it in field 541 of
> the Holdings record
> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fprotect-us.mimecast.com%2Fs%2Fyv5HC73yPMHRNwKh8BRcD%3Fdomain%3Dloc.gov&data=04%7C01%7Cfrancis.lapka%40yale.edu%7C746535c6e3d140d18d5608d9f73a8c62%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637812653870496752%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=WVvabUi6d%2B%2Fs2ZXHUa2s3O0kfCmt50KHWS2ntdU8E%2Bc%3D&reserved=0>,
> but the semantics of 541 subfields are all imperfect matches. In my ideal
> world, the fund data would display in alignment with the pertinent holding *and
> *it would be indexed as a search facet.
>
>
>
> What do others do?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Francis
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Francis Lapka
>
> *Senior Catalog Librarian*
>
> Department of Rare Books and Manuscripts
>
> Yale Center for British Art
>
> 203-432-9672  ·  francis.lapka at yale.edu
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20220225/199422eb/attachment.htm>