[DCRB-L] Colored illustrations

Juliet McLaren juliet at citrus.ucr.edu
Wed Apr 30 15:33:16 MDT 2003


I agree with Jane; black and white are two colors, and grayscale will 
perhaps make more than three, but no one would mistake them for 'colored' 
illustrations. As far as the RBMS logo goes, we have used "red and black" 
for years to describe just that.  I do think that 'sepia'  might best be 
described as sepia, since it is a single, recognizable color tone that is 
familiar to everyone in our line of work and to most of our client 
population as well.  It would be simple enough for most of us to describe 
what we see, I think, but perhaps it is time for experts in the field of 
rare and medium-rare illustration to weigh in here.  Do we need a specific, 
or non-specific definition of 'colored'? Or can we just say (as they do in 
some dog show classes) "any colors other than black or sepia"? (ok, ok, 
they don't describe dogs as "sepia", but ASCOB is just slightly more arcane).

Juliet


At 04:08 PM 4/30/03 -0400, Jane Gillis wrote:
>I just had an illustration printed in one color (green) on  bright yellow 
>paper.  I took it around to catalogers and various library 
>assistants.  *Everyone* said this was "Colored".  With the logo, if all 
>you had was the RBMS--just red on white background--would that not be colored.
>
>  "Not Colored", to me, is something that is black, white and/or 
> grayscale.   "Colored" has at least one color, other than black, white or 
> grayscale.  (I don't know about sepia)
>
>Jane Gillis
>
>At 11:04 AM 4/29/2003 Tuesday-0400, Deborah J. Leslie wrote:
>
>>I read John's proposal with appropriate amounts of amusement and 
>>seriousness. However, I do think we need  a definition of "colored," 
>>because otherwise illustrations printed in one color on a tinted paper 
>>would be described by some as colored, which I don't think we want.
>>
>>What if we were to specify that a colored illustration is one that is 
>>printed in at least two different colors of ink? It's easy to understand, 
>>and I believe that is the original intent of the clumsy wording. And the 
>>RBMS logo would qualify as colored.
>>
>>This does not consider the case of hand-coloring, however, and I have 
>>some issues with WG3 recommendations regarding that, which I will post in 
>>due time.
>>
>>___________________________
>>Deborah J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S.
>>Head of Cataloging
>>Folger Shakespeare Library
>>201 East Capitol St., S.E.
>>Washington, D.C. 20003
>>202.675-0369 (p)
>>202.675-0328 (f)
>>djleslie at folger.edu
>><file://www.folger.edu>www.folger.edu
>
>Jane Gillis | Rare Book Cataloger|  Sterling Memorial Library
>Yale University | New Haven CT  06520
>(203)432-2633 (voice) | (203)432-4047 (fax) | jane.gillis at yale.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20030430/30bef23d/attachment.htm 


More information about the DCRM-L mailing list