[DCRM-L] Introduction comments

[Jane Gillis]

I think that separating out pcc, whether core or full, from just 
full, might be useful.  Pcc records require that all access points be 
authorized; full, non-pcc, records do not.  Core records do require 
that all access points be authorized, because core is only pcc.

Jane

At 03:30 PM 9/21/2006 Thursday-0400, Deborah J. Leslie wrote:

>Possibly because the definition of core-level cataloging is a BIBCO 
>endeavor, is it not, whereas full-level cataloging did not originate 
>with PCC. Therefore, mention of BIBCO requirements make sense in the 
>section on core, but not necessarily in the section on full.
>
>__________________________________________
>
>Deborah J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S.
>
>Chair, RBMS Bibliographic Standards Committee
>
><http://www.folger.edu/bsc/index.html>http://www.folger.edu/bsc/index.html
>
>Head of Cataloging, Folger Shakespeare Library
>
>201 East Capitol St., S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003
>
>djleslie at folger.edu || 202.675-0369 || 
><http://www.folger.edu>http://www.folger.edu
>
>-----Original Message-----
>
>From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu 
>[<mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu>mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] 
>On Behalf Of Manon Theroux
>
>Sent: 21 September 2006 15:26
>
>To: DCRM Revision Group List
>
>Subject: RE: [DCRM-L] Introduction comments
>
>You're right, Nina, at least for PCC full-level
>
>records. The BIBCO Manual seems pretty clear
>
>about it. I'm so glad you spoke up.
>
>So, in the full-level section of the Intro, we need to strike:
>
>"The name headings need not be established using
>
>authority records, although full authority work
>
>will generally result in greater consistency of headings and improved access."
>
>And I suggest we include the following somewhere in that paragraph:
>
>"If an institution is a BIBCO participant,
>
>contributing full-level records as part of the
>
>Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC), all
>
>headings must be established in the LC/NACO and LC/SACO Authority Files."
>
>to parallel the text in the core-level section.
>
>Now I wonder what led me/us to think the way we
>
>did. This text has been in the Pre-Cataloging
>
>Decisions section for a long time!
>
>-Manon
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20060921/3ba1c7ed/attachment.htm