Fw: [DCRM-L] Introduction comments
nschneider at nypl.org
nschneider at nypl.org
Thu Sep 21 15:22:48 MDT 2006
This is from my colleague, Virginia Bartow. I think she's speaking directly
to Manon's solution to provide guidelines to PCC institutions:
"If an institution is a BIBCO participant,
contributing full-level records as part of the
Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC), all
headings must be established in the LC/NACO and LC/SACO Authority Files."
Nina
+------------------
Nina Schneider
Librarian
Berg Collection of English & American Literature, Room 320
The New York Public Library
Fifth Avenue and 42nd Street
New York, NY 10018-2788
Tel.: (212) 642-0111
Fax.: (212) 930-0079
nschneider at nypl.org
----- Forwarded by Nina Schneider/MHT/Nypl on 09/21/2006 05:15 PM -----
vbartow/MHT/Nypl
09/21/2006 04:23 To
PM Nina Schneider/MHT/Nypl at NYPL
cc
Subject
RE: [DCRM-L] Introduction comments
(Document link: Nina Schneider)
Weighing in with an opinion. If you are cataloging according to AACR2
(leader byte 18=a) then you are indicating that the catalog record contains
AACR2 forms for all access points.
Encoding a MARC record for full-level (leader byte 17= _ (National library
or PCC program); or = i (utility member library supplied)) indicates that
the data in the MARC record is complete according to the MARC standard (it
includes all required tags and values for the fixed fields, variable length
fields, etc.). Headings will be established in the NAF and SAF.
Adding the DCRM(B) to the 040 would mean that all of the requirements of
DCRM(B) cataloging rules (description and access points) were followed.
I think that you need to allow that libraries will supply cataloging to the
shared bibliographic database with different combinations of these three
variables.
Yours,
Virginia Bartow
Curator, George Arents Collection, and Head, Special Collections Cataloging
Humanities and Social Sciences Library
The New York Public Library
http://www.nypl.org/humanities/
More information about the DCRM-L
mailing list