FW: [DCRM-L] DCRM(B) cataloging in OCLC

Deborah J. Leslie DJLeslie at FOLGER.edu
Thu Sep 13 10:09:06 MDT 2007


My boss (hi Jim) reminded me that he had discussed the issue of
duplicate record reporting with Chris Grabenstatter. He told her that we
would use the most convenient means (=doing it from the record itself)
or not at all. She agreed that it would be fine to do it directly from
the record. 

__________________________
Deborah J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S.
Head of Cataloging
Folger Shakespeare Library
201 East Capitol St., S.E.
Washington, D.C. 20003
202.675-0369
djleslie at folger.edu | http://www.folger.edu 


-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Kuhn 
Sent: Thursday, 13 September, 2007 09:12
To: Deborah J. Leslie; Cataloging Group
Subject: RE: [DCRM-L] DCRM(B) cataloging in OCLC

Yes, that's true but in my discussion with Chris Grabbenstatter I
emphasized that we would use the most efficient method ... or likely
none at all. She agreed that doing it directly from the record would be
fine. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Deborah J. Leslie 
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 6:39 PM
To: Cataloging Group
Subject: FW: [DCRM-L] DCRM(B) cataloging in OCLC


Turns out there is a special merge request form, so we won't be doing
error reporting on individual duplicate records:
https://www3.oclc.org/app/bibdup/ 	

__________________________
Deborah J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S.
Head of Cataloging
Folger Shakespeare Library
201 East Capitol St., S.E.
Washington, D.C. 20003
202.675-0369
djleslie at folger.edu | http://www.folger.edu 


-----Original Message-----
From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On
Behalf Of Randal Brandt
Sent: Wednesday, 12 September, 2007 18:33
To: DCRM Revision Group List
Subject: RE: [DCRM-L] DCRM(B) cataloging in OCLC

One more little thing to add to this discussion. As previously
mentioned, 
there are already many duplicate master records in OCLC (even more now
that 
the RLIN records have migrated over to OCLC). I encourage everyone to
use 
the WorldCat Duplicate Record Merge Request reporting system to ask OCLC
to 
merge them. The form can be found here:
https://www3.oclc.org/app/bibdup/

Just remember to leave parallel language records and records for 
microforms/electronic versions alone.

Randy

At 02:08 PM 9/12/2007, you wrote:
>At the Folger, we're getting ready to apply for Enhance status sooner
>rather than later, for the very reasons Randy and others have
mentioned.
>
>
>I've been using OCLC to catalog for a full two weeks now, and
frequently
>find records for rare books that are not coded bdrb, dcrb, &c., but
seem
>to have been cataloged using one of the special codes. For that reason
>alone I would not support parallel records for AACR2 and DCRM(B)
>descriptive cataloging conventions.  (Bob, looks like you're on your
own
>for that one!)
>
>Deborah
>
>__________________________
>Deborah J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S.
>Head of Cataloging
>Folger Shakespeare Library
>201 East Capitol St., S.E.
>Washington, D.C. 20003
>202.675-0369
>djleslie at folger.edu | http://www.folger.edu
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On
>Behalf Of Johnson, Elizabeth L.
>Sent: Wednesday, 12 September, 2007 16:16
>To: dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu
>Subject: RE: [DCRM-L] DCRM(B) cataloging in OCLC
>
>I agree with Jain and Randal.  I believe we do not need any more
>duplicate records in OCLC, but enhancing records is a great help to us
>all.
>
>Elizabeth J.

__________________________
Randal Brandt
Principal Cataloger
The Bancroft Library
(510) 643-2275
rbrandt at library.berkeley.edu
http://bancroft.berkeley.edu




More information about the DCRM-L mailing list