[DCRM-L] literature of prejudice vs. polemical

Tue Jul 28 07:16:53 MDT 2009

From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On Behalf Of Eduardo Tenenbaum
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 1:29 PM
To: 'DCRM Revision Group List'
Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] literature of prejudice vs. polemical

I think we are doing ourselves a disservice by not making a clear distinction between "prejudice" and "polemic."  The two are clearly different. Our thesaurus has NTs under "Literature of prejudice" that could easily belong under "Polemical literature", for example "Anti-clerical."  The distinction between "prejuduce" and "polemic" is between  unreasoned opinion/hostility and reasoned argument (however strongly worded).

>From the OED:

prejudice, n.
I. Prejudgement.
    1. a. Preconceived opinion not based on reason or actual experience; bias, partiality; (now) spec. unreasoned dislike, hostility, or antagonism towards, or discrimination against, a race, sex, or other class of people.

------------------------------

hate, n.1
 1. a. An emotion of extreme dislike or aversion; detestation, abhorrence, hatred. Now chiefly poet.

 b. The object of hatred. poetic.

2. b. Used attrib. or as quasi-adj.: designed to stir up hate, e.g. hate campaign; marked or characterized by hate; hate mail, letters (often anonymous) in which the senders express their hostility towards the recipient.

DRAFT ADDITIONS JUNE 2002
    hate, n.1
  [cid:image001.gif at 01CA0F64.255A94C0]  hate crime n. orig. U.S. a crime, usually violent, motivated by hatred or intolerance of another social group, esp. on the basis of race or sexuality; crime of this type; freq. attrib. (occas. in pl.), designating legislation, etc., framed to address such crime.

---------------------------------

polemic, adj. and n.

A. adj.    Of the nature of, exhibiting, given to, or relating to dispute or controversy; contentious, disputatious, combative

B. n.
    1. A controversial argument; a strong verbal or written attack on a person, opinion, doctrine, etc.; (as a mass noun) writing or opinion of this kind. Also: (in sing. and pl.) aggressive debate or controversy; the practice of engaging in such debate.

________________________________
From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On Behalf Of Schneider, Nina
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 12:57 PM
To: DCRM Revision Group List
Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] literature of prejudice vs. polemical

I've been searching LCSH for some ideas. There's a subject heading "Attitudes (Psychology)" in LCSH. There are also variations on "opinions." If we feel it's necessary to change the genre term, we may want to look at these.

Nina

+-------
Nina Schneider
Head Cataloger
William Andrews Clark Memorial Library
2520 Cimarron Street
Los Angeles, CA  90018

323-731-8529
nschneider at humnet.ucla.edu

________________________________
From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On Behalf Of Holly Phelps
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 8:19 AM
To: DCRM Revision Group List
Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] literature of prejudice vs. polemical
Interesting discussion.
I use the NTs but not the broader term. Does anyone? Would it be useful to remove the term from the list, and just use something (Controversial literature?) in brackets under [Content of work] - [Political works] in the hierarchical list? I'd like to see the NTs stay grouped somehow.

H.A. Phelps

hphelps at librarycompany.org

________________________________
From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On Behalf Of Dooley,Jackie
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 11:16 AM
To: DCRM Revision Group List
Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] literature of prejudice vs. polemical

Yes, I get it. My point is that it's so soft as to be relatively meaningless. How about "hate literature"? :) After all, our society calls them "hate groups," not "polemical groups." Good literary warrant.

On 6/19/09 7:39 AM, "Deborah Leslie" <djleslie at folger.edu> wrote:
One of the things that came up in conversation was that we knew it when we saw it, but couldn't find a non-derogatory name for it. "Polemical" isn't necessarily derogatory, while "Prejudice" is.

From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On Behalf Of Dooley,Jackie
Sent: Friday, 19 June, 2009 10:29
To: DCRM Revision Group List
Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] literature of prejudice vs. polemical

Strikes me as equally subjective-not to mention vague, since it could include stuff with a much softer point of view than e.g. a John Birch or KKK pub that is patently prejudicial to a particular group. -Jackie

On 6/19/09 7:16 AM, "Deborah Leslie" <djleslie at folger.edu> wrote:
I just had an epiphany. Some of you remember discussions held a few years ago about the problem with the genre term "Literature of prejudice," which violates the cataloger's ethic of labelling (works, people) in a way they would not name themselves. But it is useful to have a term in the hierarchy to collocate this kind of literature.

How about "Polemical literature"?

___________________________________________
Deborah J. Leslie, M.A., M.L.S.
Head of Cataloging, Folger Shakespeare Library
201 East Capitol St., s.E., Washington, D.C. 20003
202.675-0369 (phone) 202.675-0328 (fax)
djleslie at folger.edu  www.folger.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20090728/5e296bae/attachment.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
Url : http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20090728/5e296bae/attachment.gif 