[DCRM-L] DPC: Omission of names in statements ofresponsibility(DCRM 1E5)

[Erin Blake]

Shoot, I linked to the comment instead of the top of the page. Here's a
better link: http://connect.ala.org/node/128698

Apologies,

  EB.

-----Original Message-----
From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On
Behalf Of Erin Blake
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 2:26 PM
To: Laurence Creider
Cc: dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu
Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] DPC: Omission of names in statements
ofresponsibility(DCRM 1E5)

I think you were just reading the html-formatted excerpt in plain-text,
Larry. The first time "1E5" was quoted in the e-mail, it was in html,
with "et al." crossed out to show deletion, and "after it" and "a phrase
in the language and script of the cataloging agency to convey the extent
of the omission" underlined to show addition.

Further down in the message, you'll see the full original passage and
the full proposed revision in plain text.

Next time, I'll put the plain-text version first, to make it less
confusing. Or, even better, a link to a webpage so everyone can see the
formatted version.

Ta da! Here's the formatted version:
http://connect.ala.org/node/128698#comment-16611

Thanks,

    EB.

-----Original Message-----
From: Laurence Creider [mailto:lcreider at lib.NMSU.Edu] 
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 6:44 PM
To: Erin Blake
Cc: dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu
Subject: Re: [DCRM-L] DPC: Omission of names in statements of
responsibility(DCRM 1E5)

Erin,

Did you perhaps leave something out?  Maybe an "or" or "and?"  The
second 
sentence of the rule in 1E5 does not make sense and seems to be 
contradicted by the example:

Indicate the omission by the mark of omission and supply "et al." after
it 
in square brackets a phrase in the language and script of the cataloging

agency to convey the extent of the omission.
>
> / idee e motti di Giannino Antona-Traversi ; disegni di G. Ardy, A.
> Bonzagni, A. Cagnoni ... [and 7 others] ; sculture di V. Franco

Larry Creider

On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Erin Blake wrote:

> Based on Manon's suggestions, here's a revised version of the proposed
> change, to be voted on by BSC members on Monday.
>
> The only changes from Monday's version are the addition of the missing
> words "after it" and the addition of 1E5 to the list of examples of
> exceptional rules in 0F1.2. If there's any more discussion, let it
> happen....
>
>
>
> Here are the relevant sections in html, with old text crossed out and
> new text underlined (plain text version follows). The example comes
from
> the DCRM(G) draft.
>
> 1E5. . . .  Optionally, if the responsible persons or bodies named in
a
> single statement are considered too numerous to list exhaustively, all
> after the third may be omitted. Indicate the omission by the mark of
> omission and supply "et al." after it in square brackets a phrase in
the
> language and script of the cataloging agency to convey the extent of
the
> omission.
>
> / idee e motti di Giannino Antona-Traversi ; disegni di G. Ardy, A.
> Bonzagni, A. Cagnoni ... [and 7 others] ; sculture di V. Franco
>
>
> 0F1.2. Give interpolations into these areas in the language and script
> of the other information in the area, except for prescribed
> interpolations and other cases specified in these rules (e.g., 1E5,
4B5,
> 4B6.2, 4C6.2). . . .
>
>
>
> Below is the original text followed by the proposed change for anyone
> with plain-text e-mail who can't see the crossings-out and
underlinings:
>
>
> ORIGINAL:
>
> 1E5. . . . Optionally, if the responsible persons or bodies named in a
> single statement are considered too numerous to list exhaustively, all
> after the third may be omitted. Indicate the omission by the mark of
> omission and supply "et al." in square brackets.
>
>
>
> 0F1.2. Give interpolations into these areas in the language and script
> of the other information in the area, except for prescribed
> interpolations and other cases specified in these rules (e.g., 4B5,
> 4B6.2, 4C6.2). . . .
>
> PROPOSED CHANGE:
>
> 1E5. . . . Optionally, if the responsible persons or bodies named in a
> single statement are considered too numerous to list exhaustively, all
> after the third may be omitted. Indicate the omission by the mark of
> omission and supply after it in square brackets a phrase in the
language
> and script of the cataloging agency to convey the extent of the
> omission.
>
>
>
> 0F1.2. [add 1E5 to parenthetical examples of exceptions]
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>   EB.
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Erin C. Blake, Ph.D.  |  Curator of Art & Special Collections  |
Folger
> Shakespeare Library  |  201 E. Capitol St. SE  | Washington, DC
> 20003-1004  |  office tel. (202) 675-0323  |  fax:  (202) 675-0328  |
> eblake at folger.edu  |  www.folger.edu
>
>
>
>

Laurence S. Creider
Special Collections Librarian
New Mexico State University
Las Cruces, NM  88003
Work: 575-646-7227
Fax: 575-646-7477
lcreider at lib.nmsu.edu