[DCRM-L] 007 field for rare materials

[Manon Theroux]

I was going to make a similar point - "monograph" simply means "A resource
that is complete in one part or intended to be completed within a finite
number of parts." We do want to require an 007 for *some* rare monographs.
But I agree that for rare *textual* monographs an 007 is not needed. When
we spell out which types of rare materials require an 007, we should
remember microforms and digital reproductions (which can get the dcrm
coding).

The BSR doesn't cover serials; those are in the CSR.

Manon

--

Manon Théroux

Head of Technical Services

U.S. Senate Library

SR-B15 Russell Senate Office Building

Washington, DC  20510-7112



On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Robert Maxwell <robert_maxwell at byu.edu>wrote:

> Option 2--not required for rare books, scores OR serials. (Note: "not
> required for rare monographs" doesn't cover it either way--not all
> monographs are codex books (AV materials are usually monographs) and
> serials don't typically require an 007 either.)
>
> In other words, 007 should be required for the same categories as it is
> required for non-rare materials. I don't see a rare reason to differ.
>
>
> Bob
>
> Robert L. Maxwell
> Ancient Languages and Special Collections Cataloger
> 6728 Harold B. Lee Library
> Brigham Young University
> Provo, UT 84602
> (801)422-5568
>
> "We should set an example for all the world, rather than confine ourselves
> to the course which has been heretofore pursued"--Eliza R. Snow, 1842.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu [mailto:dcrm-l-bounces at lib.byu.edu] On
> Behalf Of Schneider, Nina
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 10:50 AM
> To: DCRM Revision Group List (dcrm-l at lib.byu.edu)
> Cc: Culbertson, Rebecca (rculbertson at ucsd.edu)
> Subject: [DCRM-L] 007 field for rare materials
> Importance: High
>
> Colleagues
>
> I've only received a handful of comments about this (see my email from
> 2/28/2014). Opinion is split between requiring the 007 for all materials
> and only requiring 007 for non-monographic materials.  Since not everyone
> weighed in, how about a straw poll?
>
> Option 1: 007 should be required for all rare materials regardless of
> format Option 2: 007 should not be required for rare monographs
>
> A quick response will be much appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
> Nina
>
> +---------------
> Nina M. Schneider
> Chair, RBMS Bibliographic Standards Committee
>
> Head Cataloger
> William Andrews Clark Memorial Library
> 2520 Cimarron Street
> Los Angeles, CA  90018
> (323) 731-8529
>
> nschneider at humnet.ucla.edu
> http://www.humnet.ucla.edu/humnet/clarklib/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserver.lib.byu.edu/pipermail/dcrm-l/attachments/20140313/f1aa77d6/attachment.html>